Skip navigation icon
menue

The Knowledge-Sharing Platform

Partnerships

01WHAT'S UP

02INTRODUCTION

EU Research and Innovation Partnerships have been used since FP6 to optimise the contribution of public and private players in achieving sustainable growth and competitiveness and addressing societal challenges, and to ensure that national policies and EU policy are mutually consistent. The discussions at the Informal Meeting of Ministers of July 2017 resulted in a general recognition by the Member States of the continued relevance of Partnerships, and called for a reformed approach tackling the complexity of the landscape and ensuring its coherence and optimal coordination.

The Council Conclusions of 1 December 2017 (18-20) provide guidance for rationalising the partnership landscape: R&I partnerships in the FP should be implemented based on the principles of EU added value, transparency, openness, impact, leverage effect, long-term financial commitment of all the involved parties, flexibility, coherence, and complementarity with EU, national and regional initiatives. All partnership initiatives should have an exit strategy from FP funding.

As a follow-up, an ERAC Ad-hoc Working Group on Partnerships was established in 2018. Its mandate is to propose e.g. criteria for selecting, implementing, monitoring and phasing out the R&I partnerships based on the guiding principles, options for rationalising the R&I partnership landscape and the set-up and implementation of this process.

Horizon Europe will follow an overall policy approach for all kinds of Partnerships (e.g. ERA-NETs, JTIs, FET Flagships, EIT/KICs). There will be 3 types of European Partnerships:

1. Co-funded partnerships (current ERA-NETs, EJP, FET Flagships model);

2. Co-programmed partnerships (cPPP model);

3. Institutionalised partnerships (Art. 185 or 187 TFEU,  EIT regulation for KICs).

In May 2019, the Commission launched a consultation of Member States on 44 possible candidates for European Partnerships as part of a strategic coordinating process. The feedback was summarised and discussed at the Shadow Strategic Programme Committee.

Share this page: Share on Linkedin Share on Twitter Share on Google+ Share on Facebook